As we move into March 2018, significant developments continue to shape the Belt and Road landscape. This monthly highlights post brings together recent news, observations from the road, and analysis of trends that are worth watching.
Constitutional Amendments in Beijing
The most consequential development this month comes from Beijing itself. The National People's Congress is currently meeting to approve a series of constitutional amendments, including the removal of presidential term limits. This change would allow Xi Jinping to remain in power beyond the two-term limit that has governed Chinese leadership transitions since the Deng Xiaoping era.
For observers of the Belt and Road Initiative, this has significant implications. The BRI is closely associated with Xi personally—it is sometimes referred to as his "signature foreign policy." The removal of term limits suggests that Xi, and by extension the BRI, will remain central to Chinese policy for the foreseeable future. Long-term infrastructure projects, which may take decades to complete, now have a more predictable political environment in China itself.
Developments Along the Corridors
In Pakistan, progress continues on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor despite persistent security concerns. New power stations are beginning to address the country's chronic electricity shortages, though questions remain about the debt burden these projects entail. Local reporting suggests that Chinese workers remain largely segregated from Pakistani communities, limiting the "people-to-people" connectivity that BRI rhetoric emphasises.
Central Asia presents a more mixed picture. Kazakhstan continues to welcome Chinese investment, positioning itself as a crucial transit hub for goods moving between China and Europe. Yet public sentiment in both Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan shows signs of wariness about Chinese influence—concerns about land purchases, labour practices, and cultural impact bubble beneath the surface of official enthusiasm.
Europe's Evolving Response
European attitudes towards the BRI are shifting perceptibly. What was initially greeted with cautious interest is increasingly viewed through a more sceptical lens. Germany and France have been particularly vocal about the need for "reciprocity" in economic relations with China—a pointed reference to the asymmetric market access that currently characterises EU-China trade.
The European Parliament has published extensive analysis on EU-China relations, highlighting both opportunities and concerns. Whilst individual member states may pursue their own engagements with the BRI, there is growing recognition that a coordinated European approach is necessary.
Reading Recommendations
For those seeking deeper analysis, several recent publications merit attention. The academic literature on the BRI continues to expand rapidly, though keeping pace with developments on the ground remains challenging. Policy briefs from think tanks in Europe, the United States, and Asia offer diverse perspectives on the initiative's implications.
Field reporting from journalists actually travelling the BRI routes provides invaluable ground-level insights that desk-based analysis cannot capture. The human stories—of workers, officials, and ordinary citizens whose lives are affected by these massive infrastructure projects—deserve more attention than they typically receive.
Looking Ahead
March promises to bring further clarity on China's political direction as the NPC session concludes. Meanwhile, on the ground, the painstaking work of building roads, laying tracks, and constructing ports continues across three continents. The gap between the grand rhetoric of "win-win cooperation" and the complex realities of implementation remains the central tension of the Belt and Road story.
As always, this project will continue documenting these developments from the ground, seeking to understand what connectivity means for the communities along the route.
← Back to Blog